Back to all resources

The Time Value of Carbon

CLF board member Larry Strain developed this white paper for the Carbon Leadership Forum in order to articulate the critical need to reduce embodied carbon quickly and identifying the need for a more urgent emphasis on re-using and retrofitting our existing building stock.

Making the case for the importance of embodied carbon

To keep global temperatures from rising above 2°C and avoid catastrophic, irreversible climate change, global emissions need to peak by 2020 and fossil fuels be phased out by 2055[i]. Given those goals, there are two critical components we need to consider when evaluating carbon reduction strategies: first, the amount of potential savings a strategy offers, and second, the time frame of those savings.  We need strategies that produce large savings fast.

As an end user of fossil fuels, the built environment accounts for more emissions than any other sector, producing nearly half of total global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions[ii]. The current gold standard for reducing emissions from buildings is building new, zero net carbon (ZNC) buildings[iii]: super-efficient buildings powered by fossil-fuel-free energy sources that have zero net emissions. This is a critical step to realize a carbon neutral built environment, but there is a problem with this strategy: building those new, ZNC buildings will generate substantial emissions.

Two other emission sources may be even more important to address in the short term: embodied carbon (eCO2e) emissions from building materials, products, and construction processes and operating emissions from existing buildings. Architecture 2030 estimates that U.S. eCO2e emissions from building materials and construction are 5.9% of total U.S. emissions[iv]. Since these emissions occur at the beginning of a building lifecycle, the impact on near-term emissions from building becomes more significant than the 5.9% figure implies. Materials matter: designing materially efficient buildings with low carbon materials and products can have a significant impact on near-term carbon emissions.

The Time Value of Carbon Initiative is being led by Larry Strain of Siegel and Strain Architects.

To learn more, access his recent whitepaper and the CLF Time Value of Carbon presentation:

[i] IPCC. 2014. “Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

[ii] “U.S. Energy Consumption by Sector”, Architecture 2030, accessed from https://architecture2030.org/buildings_problem_why/ 2016 07 27.

[iii] Architecture 2030, “Zero Net Carbon (ZNC) Building”, Accessed from https://www.architecture2030.org/downloads/znc_building_definition.pdf   2016 07 27.

Embodied Carbon Policy Reduction Calculator

The Policy Reduction Calculator is a web-based tool developed by the Carbon Leadership Forum to provide policymakers with data-driven insights on low embodied carbon policies in North America.

Reclaimed and Reused: Recommended LCA Modeling Guidance to Support EPDs for Reused Construction Materials

Material reuse is one strategy for reducing the embodied carbon of construction. While the preparation of previously used materials for reuse has an environmental impact, it avoids many of the resource extraction and manufacturing impacts of building with newly manufactured products. Given the amount of demolition and deconstruction across North America (and beyond), there is a vast potential for material reuse to expand in scale. However, barriers to material reuse scaling exist.

DEQ Low Embodied Carbon Housing Program: Roadmap to Success

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States, a collaboration between the Carbon Leadership Forum (CLF), RMI, and the University of Washington (UW) Life Cycle Lab, provides an assessment of embodied carbon from US construction materials and explores pathways to align with a 1.5°C global warming limit.

International Embodied Carbon Data Availability: A Review of Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Availability in Europe, China, and Australia

CLF completed a landscape analysis of product-level embodied carbon data availability in regions outside North America with the goals of: (i) understanding how LCA/EPD data availability varies globally; (ii) informing where targeted initiatives are needed to increase the availability of data; and (iii) determining whether adequate EPD data exists to develop CLF Material Baselines outside North America. This report summarizes our findings and provides initial insights into what data is available to inform low-carbon procurement efforts in Australia, China, and Europe.

The CLF Benchmark Explorer

Emissions from the operations of buildings and infrastructure are significant, well-understood contributors to national and global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the contribution of embodied carbon—emissions associated with the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of construction materials across the life cycle of a building or asset—is neglected by comparison. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood).

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States, a collaboration between the Carbon Leadership Forum (CLF), RMI, and the University of Washington (UW) Life Cycle Lab, provides an assessment of embodied carbon from US construction materials and explores pathways to align with a 1.5°C global warming limit.

Washington State Carbon Emissions Estimation: 2025 – 2050

Emissions from the operations of buildings and infrastructure are significant, well-understood contributors to national and global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the contribution of embodied carbon—emissions associated with the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of construction materials across the life cycle of a building or asset—is neglected by comparison. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood).

View all policy resources in our resource library