Back to all resources

Transformative Materialien

Beschleunigung eines Ökosystems | Oktober 2021

Das Potenzial für bedeutende Klimaauswirkungen durch Materialien, die als Kohlenstoffsenken dienen, verschafft diesen Materialien jetzt einen klaren Vorteil, da sie das Klimaprofil von Gebäuden von einem führenden Treiber für Kohlenstoffemissionen zu Kohlenstoffspeichern umkehren können, die dazu beitragen können, es umzukehren.

Autoren

Das Forschungsteam des Carbon Leadership Forum am College of Built Environments der University of Washington:

  • Julie Kriegh, PhD, AIA, Research Scientist, Carbon Leadership Forum, Department of Architecture, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, Principal und Gründer der Kriegh Architecture Studios | Design + Forschung.
  • Chris Magwood, Direktor, Endeavour Center, Schule für nachhaltiges Bauen, Peterborough, Ontario, Kanada.
  • Wil Srubar III, PhD, außerordentlicher Professor, Universität von Colorado Boulder, Bau-, Umwelt- und Architekturingenieurwesen, Materialwissenschaft und Ingenieurwesen.
  • Meghan Lewis, Senior Researcher, Carbon Leadership Forum, Department of Architecture, College of Built Environments, University of Washington.
  • Kate Simonen, AIA, SE, Executive Director, Carbon Leadership Forum, Fakultät für Architektur, College of Built Environments, University of Washington.

Autorenbeiträge: Schreiben – Originalentwurf: JK, CM und WS; Schreiben – Review und Editieren: JK, ML, CM, KS, WS; Konzeptualisierung: JK, CM, KS, WS; Methodik: JK, CM, WS; Fördermittelakquise: JK und KS; Projektleiter und Verwaltung: JK; Visualisierung: JK

Autoren

Das Forschungsteam des Carbon Leadership Forum am College of Built Environments der University of Washington:

  • Julie Kriegh, PhD, AIA, Research Scientist, Carbon Leadership Forum, Department of Architecture, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, Principal und Gründer der Kriegh Architecture Studios | Design + Forschung.
  • Chris Magwood, Direktor, Endeavour Center, Schule für nachhaltiges Bauen, Peterborough, Ontario, Kanada.
  • Wil Srubar III, PhD, außerordentlicher Professor, Universität von Colorado Boulder, Bau-, Umwelt- und Architekturingenieurwesen, Materialwissenschaft und Ingenieurwesen.
  • Meghan Lewis, Senior Researcher, Carbon Leadership Forum, Department of Architecture, College of Built Environments, University of Washington.
  • Kate Simonen, AIA, SE, Executive Director, Carbon Leadership Forum, Fakultät für Architektur, College of Built Environments, University of Washington.

Autorenbeiträge: Schreiben – Originalentwurf: JK, CM und WS; Schreiben – Review und Editieren: JK, ML, CM, KS, WS; Konzeptualisierung: JK, CM, KS, WS; Methodik: JK, CM, WS; Fördermittelakquise: JK und KS; Projektleiter und Verwaltung: JK; Visualisierung: JK

Stand: Dezember 2021

Danksagung

Das Forschungsteam möchte Microsoft für die Finanzierung dieser Forschung und den folgenden Personen danken:

  • Sean James, Microsoft, Director of Datacenter Research für die Beauftragung des Projekts.
  • Ben Stanley, WSP-Berater für Nachhaltigkeit, Energie und Klimawandel und Projektmanager und das WSP-Teammitglied Ryan Dick für ihre Unterstützung des Projekts.

Das Forschungsteam möchte Monica Huang für die Hilfe bei der Vorbereitung dieser Veröffentlichung und Andrew Himes für die Vorbereitung der Website-Veröffentlichung danken.

Transformative Materialien Abdeckung

Zitat

Kriegh, J., Magwood, C., Srubar, W., Lewis, M., Simonen, K. (2021).  Transformative kohlenstoffspeichernde Materialien: Beschleunigung eines Ökosystemberichtshttps://hdl.handle.net/1773/48126

Urheberrechte ©

Die transformativen kohlenstoffspeichernden Materialien: Beschleunigung eines Ökosystemberichts ist unter einer Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License lizenziert.

Titelbild: Shutterstock

Anhang 1: Transformative Materials Index

Anhang 2: IDEA-Labor

Das IDEA-Labor ist aus Vorschlägen von Drs. Lee, Kriegh und Dossick (UW College of Built Environments);
Dr. Srubar (UC Boulder); und ED. Magwood (Endeavor Center), die Anfang 2021 ins Leben gerufen wurden.

Reclaimed and Reused: Recommended LCA Modeling Guidance to Support EPDs for Reused Construction Materials

Material reuse is one strategy for reducing the embodied carbon of construction. While the preparation of previously used materials for reuse has an environmental impact, it avoids many of the resource extraction and manufacturing impacts of building with newly manufactured products. Given the amount of demolition and deconstruction across North America (and beyond), there is a vast potential for material reuse to expand in scale. However, barriers to material reuse scaling exist.

DEQ Low Embodied Carbon Housing Program: Roadmap to Success

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States, a collaboration between the Carbon Leadership Forum (CLF), RMI, and the University of Washington (UW) Life Cycle Lab, provides an assessment of embodied carbon from US construction materials and explores pathways to align with a 1.5°C global warming limit.

International Embodied Carbon Data Availability: A Review of Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Availability in Europe, China, and Australia

CLF completed a landscape analysis of product-level embodied carbon data availability in regions outside North America with the goals of: (i) understanding how LCA/EPD data availability varies globally; (ii) informing where targeted initiatives are needed to increase the availability of data; and (iii) determining whether adequate EPD data exists to develop CLF Material Baselines outside North America. This report summarizes our findings and provides initial insights into what data is available to inform low-carbon procurement efforts in Australia, China, and Europe.

The CLF Benchmark Explorer

Emissions from the operations of buildings and infrastructure are significant, well-understood contributors to national and global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the contribution of embodied carbon—emissions associated with the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of construction materials across the life cycle of a building or asset—is neglected by comparison. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood).

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States

Embodied Carbon Pathways to 2050 for the United States, a collaboration between the Carbon Leadership Forum (CLF), RMI, and the University of Washington (UW) Life Cycle Lab, provides an assessment of embodied carbon from US construction materials and explores pathways to align with a 1.5°C global warming limit.

Washington State Carbon Emissions Estimation: 2025 – 2050

Emissions from the operations of buildings and infrastructure are significant, well-understood contributors to national and global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the contribution of embodied carbon—emissions associated with the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of construction materials across the life cycle of a building or asset—is neglected by comparison. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood).

View all policy resources in our resource library