Sep 17, 2020

Renee Cheng: Change Agency, Value Change

Amid the pandemic, economic crash, and social justice outcries awaits a collision that will reveal new questions for the design profession, writes the renowned educator, researcher, and current dean of the University of Washington’s College of Built Environments.

By Renee Cheng

Renée Cheng, FAIA, DPACSA, is a nationally renowned professor in the Department of Architecture and Dean of the College of Built Environments at the University of Washington, in Seattle. Educated at Harvard College and Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cheng has been recognized for education excellence with numerous awards from AIA and others. She is leading the research team developing the AIA Guides for Equitable Practice. Elevated to the AIA College of Fellows in 2016, Cheng has served as AIA Minnesota President in 2009 as well as on several AIA committees on topics related to knowledge, innovation, culture, and equity.

renee cheng

Sean Airhart/NBBJ Renee Cheng

Collisions are violent. The greater the mass or velocity of objects, the greater the energy released. The crises of the pandemic, economic crash, and social justice outcries are massive and still accelerating. In the wake of their collision, they will reveal new questions for our profession—and newfound energy to address them.

Previously, architects pondering whether a new building was worthy of adding to our canon would ask “What does it look like?” and maybe “How well does it function?”

Now we need to know more: What’s its embodied carbon? Is it resilient to natural disasters? Did innovation help eliminate waste or increase value? Furthermore, are its supply streams fair trade? Does its construction or operation depend on the economics of indentured or slave labor? Can its airflow help stop the spread of disease? Whom does the building benefit?

In architecture education, a space with pinup walls and north-facing windows was once the main ingredient to a successful design studio. Instructors asked students about their design processes and outcomes and—cognizant of studio culture’s perpetuation of the 24/7 cycle—worried about those pulling all-nighters.

Now we must also wonder how often students wash their hands and whether they attended a party last night. We worry why students on remote learning are whispering or silent: Are they bored, in a different time zone, packed together in a household, caring for a sick family member, or simply maxed out on screen time?

Pursuing these deeper questions might feel intimidating or intrusive, particularly when the tools to answer them can be unfamiliar or unknown. But there is freedom in interrogating, rethinking, and finding new stories in histories we thought we knew.

Through this process, we may affirm truths that many of us had suspected: Buildings are not objects; architects may be complicit in the structural inequities of the built world; the studio format is not sacred; students’ personal lives are relevant; the invisible forces of culture have visible consequences; and cultural drivers of inequality should be disrupted and reformed.

 [T]here is freedom in interrogating, rethinking, and finding new stories in histories we thought we knew.

In order to answer these difficult but essential questions, architectural practitioners and educators need to make two fundamental shifts.

First, we change the agency of who has a voice and give power and responsibility to those who are most impacted by and most often left out of decision-making processes. In studios, ask students to break—and then rebuild—the model of teaching. In firms, flip the role of the emerging designer from the trainee to the pilot who tests new practice models. In communities, acknowledge the authority of the lived experience of residents and use their definition of justice to define project needs. We must accept that a building is not always the only answer and that design is not always the most important expertise.

Second, we change the way architecture is valued. We link design intent with social, health, and economic impacts through research—and base architectural fees on those outcomes. This opens paths to alternatives to the competitive bid process, in which firms fight to provide services for diminishing fees. We partner with students and faculty who are advancing research agendas on embodied carbon, equity, social justice, and health so we can apply and test research in our projects. And we stop assuming that our firm is alone in this pursuit or that proprietary work limits what can be shared. There is plenty to do and plenty of credit to go around when progress is made.

As the crises near their collision, let’s channel the imminent release of energy toward substantial and creative changes that will expedite our search for new ways of thinking, educating, building, and designing. These changes will become a starting point for work that is long overdue.

This essay was originally published in Architect Magazine, September 2020.

Latest Features

Introducing Brad Benke

Researcher, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Brad Benke, AIA, is a Research Scientist at the Carbon Leadership Forum focused on...

The Embodied Carbon Challenge for India

Kickoff for CLF Bengaluru Outlines Opportunities for Collaboration and Actionby Abhinav Sujit Project director and architect for klimArt Pvt Ltd,...

Changing the World One City at a Time

CLF Regional Hubs Flourish in Philly, Phoenix, Minnesota, Seattle, Boston, Austin, Atlanta, Ottawa, Chicago, Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco,...

Introducing Meghan Lewis

Senior Researcher, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Meghan Lewis is a Senior Researcher at the Carbon Leadership Forum, where she...

Introducing Stephanie Carlisle

Senior Researcher, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Stephanie Carlisle is an architect and environmental researcher whose work...

Introducing Monica Huang

Research Engineer, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Monica Huang is a research engineer with experience in environmental life cycle...

Introducing Andrew Himes

Director of Collective Impact, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Andrew Himes is director of collective impact initiatives to reduce...

Learning About Forests, Carbon, and Wood

Wood Carbon Seminars: A CLF Learning Series by Monica Huang Research Engineer, Carbon Leadership Forum In April 2020 we launched the Wood Carbon...

Origins: Embodied Carbon Benchmark Study

"We sought to develop a database of existing building embodied carbon studies  to discover trends and establish better ways to reduce uncertainties...

Decarbonization and Social Equity

Environmental Stewardship and Social Responsibility: We Can Do It All By Donald I. King FAIA Eco-consciousness and the selling of green design For...

Introducing Anthony Hickling

Managing Director, Carbon Leadership Forum, University of Washington Anthony Hickling has experience in environmental and social sustainability as...

Our Mission is Transformation

by Kate Simonen Founding Director of the Carbon Leadership Forum We’re living through an extraordinary moment in human history, as though the 1918...

The Nehemiah Initiative

Building Beloved Community While Working to Decarbonize Buildings by Mark Jones with Andrew Himes The Central District is an historically Black...

The Delacorte Review: The Baller

Can attitude help save the planet? A frightened climate reporter meets an ex-basketball player with a serious game plan. By Audrey Gray Teammates...