{"id":987508540,"date":"2025-07-29T16:48:42","date_gmt":"2025-07-29T23:48:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/carbonleadershipforum.org\/?p=987508540"},"modified":"2025-08-13T11:27:13","modified_gmt":"2025-08-13T18:27:13","slug":"washington-state-carbon-emissions-estimation-2025-2050","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/carbonleadershipforum.org\/de\/washington-state-carbon-emissions-estimation-2025-2050\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington State Carbon Emissions Estimation: 2025 – 2050"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ custom_padding=”||||true|false” da_disable_devices=”off|off|off” global_colors_info=”{}” da_is_popup=”off” da_exit_intent=”off” da_has_close=”on” da_alt_close=”off” da_dark_close=”off” da_not_modal=”on” da_is_singular=”off” da_with_loader=”off” da_has_shadow=”on”][et_pb_row column_structure=”2_3,1_3″ admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”19f92ca0-850f-4d09-a069-72fc36dea286″ custom_margin=”||20px||false|false” custom_padding=”40px|40px|20px|40px|false|true” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Emissions from the operations of buildings and infrastructure are significant, well-understood contributors to national and global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the contribution of <\/span>embodied carbon<\/b>\u2014emissions associated with the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of construction materials across the life cycle of a building or asset\u2014is neglected by comparison. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood). <\/span><\/p>\n

While these are important contributors, they are still only a percentage of embodied carbon. As we approach global climate targets in 2030 and 2050, it is increasingly important to have data on where the largest, most urgent opportunities are for reducing emissions, including embodied emissions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In this report, we take steps towards addressing this gap in knowledge by estimating the embodied and operational carbon of buildings and infrastructure in Washington State during the period between 2025 and 2050. Our findings highlight the comparable significance of embodied carbon\u2019s share of the estimated impacts to operational carbon\u2019s share over the upcoming 25-year period<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

About<\/h2>\n

Emissions from the operations of buildings are significant, well-understood contributors to state, national, and global GHG emissions. However, the contribution of embodied carbon is less well understood. Even at the global level, embodied carbon estimates are typically based on manufacturing emissions estimates from the production of a handful of the highest-impact materials (e.g. concrete, steel, aluminum, and wood). While these are important contributors, they are still only a percentage of embodied carbon.<\/span><\/p>\n

This data gap also exists in Washington State. The most recent Washington State GHG inventory estimates total state emissions in 2021 at 96.1 mmtCO<\/span>2<\/span>e, using a production-based approach, except for electricity, where they use a consumption-based approach <\/span>(WA Department of Ecology 2025)<\/span><\/a>. As described by the authors of the WA State GHG Inventory, \u201cconsumption-based electricity emissions for Washington provide a more accurate picture of emissions from electricity, because Washington imports electricity from nearby states in the Northwest Power Pool.\u201d The same can be said for industrial and other emissions related to embodied carbon, though a consumption-based inventory is not currently available.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

As we approach global climate targets in 2030 and 2050, it is increasingly important to have data on where the largest, most urgent opportunities are for reducing emissions, including embodied emissions. This study, therefore, aims to (1) fill the gap in current GHG estimates for Washington State by estimating both operational and embodied emissions attributable to buildings and infrastructure and (2) develop projections for how those emissions will increase between 2025 and 2050.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

This paper includes estimates of:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. embodied carbon from the material sourcing and construction of new buildings and their sites;<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. embodied carbon from the maintenance, repair, and renovation of existing buildings, typically part of the \u2018use\u2019 stage in an LCA;<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. embodied carbon from potent refrigerant leakage from air-conditioning, refrigeration equipment, and foams in existing buildings, and is typically part of the \u2018use\u2019 stage in an LCA;<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. embodied carbon from the recycling and disposal of materials generated in the construction of new buildings and in the upkeep, renovation and demolition of existing buildings;<\/span><\/li>\n
  5. operational carbon from fossil fuels and electricity usage in buildings and infrastructure; and<\/span><\/li>\n
  6. embodied carbon from the material sourcing and construction of infrastructure and roadways, and the full life cycle of parks and open spaces.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

    Washington State Carbon Emissions Estimation: 2025 – 2050<\/h2>\n

    [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”20px||20px||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}”]